Concept Note
The Anthropocene, alluding to a geological epoch in which human
presence accounts for the most consequential geophysical force, is
subjected to criticism for representing homo sapiens as a homogeneous
species within a geological stratum. The critics of the Anthropocene
hypothesis charge it with the flaw of considering the human as a
singular carbon-emitting subject, ignoring such “anthropological
differences” that recognise humans in diverse sociological strata with
varied ethnic, gendered, cultural, and geopolitical identities
(Chakrabarty 2012, 14). While ignoring the human-induced geophysical
changes is impossible, it is equally essential to recognise the uneven
distribution of those changes and their impacts based on a region’s
demography and geo-political situation. Such a disparity intensifies the
discussion on human agency, justice, and human subjectivity, which are
inextricably linked to human history. Therefore, it seems crucial to
critically assess the human subjects with their plurality vis-à-vis the
concurrent human-driven planetary crises in the Anthropocene.
The term ‘Anthropocene’, emphasising the human agency as the dominant
geophysical factor, has been doing rounds in the field of science since
the 1980s. During the decade, a group of South Asian historians known
as the Subaltern Studies Collective also emerged to reclaim the agency
of humans on the sociopolitical fringes, and their endeavours resulted
in an analogous writing of marginal groups’ history. While the
Anthropocene notion implies a persistent impact of human agency on
planetary conditions, Subaltern Studies aims to isolate something
resembling an agency for the Subaltern – no matter how incoherent and
inconsistent. In Subaltern Studies 2.0 (2022), Milinda Banerjee
and Jelle J.P. Wouters, echoing the ethos of the earlier collective,
widen the scope by stressing the interdependence of ‘multibeing
communities,’ a necessary intervention amid the planetary crises. The
planetary crisis “calls on us to extend ideas of politics and justice to
the nonhuman […]” (Chakrabarty 2021, 13) and to humans on the margins.
Any political interpretation contextualised in the anthropocenic
planetary crises also requires the ‘plural epistemologies’ as an
interpretative strategy. The ‘plural epistemologies’ represent multiple
beings beyond the dominant history to recognise the subaltern subjects
as historical beings. The subaltern subjects as historical beings cannot
escape their socio-geographical situatedness in the present planetary
crises. Humanists have criticised the Anthropocene discourse for
overlooking subaltern subjects’ situatedness in its attempt to reify the
human as a monolithic force. Acknowledging the (largely ignored)
subalterns’ historicity in the epoch characterised by human-caused
planetary crises, it appears feasible to call into question the
relevance of the Anthropocene discourse and investigate the sense it
makes in South Asia, particularly when viewed through the critical
lenses of the Subaltern Studies.
In this regard, the proposed volume aims to facilitate an eventful
dialogue between the two discursive fields of study of the Anthropocene
and the Subaltern Studies to (re)define human agency and subjecthood in
the human-dominated epoch, primarily through analysing subaltern
narratives in South Asia. The volume intends to further questions: Does
the human-dominated epoch only refer to humans with power? Does the
Anthropocene grossly disregard the subaltern communities’ presence? What
role does the subaltern play in the Anthropocene? How do we speculate
the future of subalterns amidst the planetary crisis? By doing so, the
volume aims to open an avenue of study, archiving the South Asian
subaltern communities’ micro-narratives concerning the current crises,
which include global warming, resource deficit, shortage of water,
deforestation, the production of climate refugees, gendered violence and
disease, pandemic, and terrorism, among others. Furthermore, the
suggested new field of study, supported by the Anthropocene discourses
and the Subaltern Studies together, seeks to cater to the new modes of
interpretation required for defining the human subject amid the
anthropocenic planetary crises, which we would refer to as the
‘planetary subaltern’ in the volume. The volume, thus, considers
‘planetary subaltern’ as a theoretical strategy to trace the South Asian
subaltern history and anticipate its future in the Anthropocene.
The volume aims to engage the discourses on the
Anthropocene and the Subaltern from three broad perspectives: theorising
the ‘Planetary Subaltern’; textual politics of the ‘Planetary
Subaltern’; and planetary crisis and the subaltern subject. Thus, we
invite chapter proposals that address the following (but not limited to)
issues contextualised in South Asia:
- A theoretical approach to the ‘Planetary Subaltern.’
- Textual and media representations of the ‘Planetary Subaltern.’
- Historiography of the ‘Planetary Subaltern’
- Indigenous communities and the planetary crisis
- Human-nonhuman interaction on the fringes
- Refugee crisis, migration and statelessness
- Gendered subaltern and the Anthropocene
- Peasant History and the Anthropocene
- Agrarian condition in the Anthropocene
- Postpoliticised environment and the Subaltern
- Planetary crisis and the class conflict
- Casteism and speciesism
- Planetary crisis and disease
- Pandemic and the Subaltern
References
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2012. “Postcolonial Studies and the Challenge of Climate Change.” New Literary History 43 (1):1-18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23259358.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Banerjee, Milinda, and Jelle J.P. Wouters. 2022. Subaltern Studies 2.0: Being Against the Capitalocene. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
*We are currently in discussions with a renowned publishing house.
Chapter proposals within 400 words and a short bio-note (50 words) are to be submitted by 15 November 2023.
The invited chapters within 6000-7000 words (excluding end notes and citations) will be due on 15 March 2024 (tentatively).
The chapter abstracts and the full-length chapters are to be submitted to the email ID theplanetarysubaltern@gmail.com
Editors: Somasree Sarkar (Assistant Professor,
Ghoshpukur College, University of North Bengal) and Agnibha Maity
(Senior Research Fellow, University of North Bengal)
For further queries, please write to us at somasree.2008@gmail.com or rs_agnibha@nbu.ac.in.